Los Angeles Views

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Phil Missig asks: Is this the beginning of the real estate turn around?

December Sales and Price Report

 

For release:
January 21, 2011

C.A.R. reports California home sales rise in December, posting seven-month sales high

LOS ANGELES (Jan. 21) – California home sales rose in December, posting their highest level since May, according to data from the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.).  The statewide median price increased from November, but was down from a year ago.

“December’s sales increase reflects buyers taking advantage of rock bottom interest rates and improved affordability since the first half of the year, when prices were higher,” said C.A.R. President Beth L. Peerce.  “Most of December’s sales opened escrow in October and November.  Rates hit their absolute lowest in October but began edging higher in November, prompting buyers to get off the fence,” she said.

Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 520,680 in December, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR® associations statewide.  December’s sales were up 5.9 percent from November’s revised pace of 491,590 but were down 6.8 percent from the revised 558,840 sales pace recorded in December 2009.  The statewide sales figure represents what would be the total number of homes sold during 2010 if sales maintained the November pace throughout the year.  It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.

Following three consecutive monthly declines, the median price of an existing, single-family detached home sold in California increased 1.7 percent from a revised $296,690 in November but was down 1.6 percent from the revised $306,860 median price recorded for the same period a year ago.

“While sales rose in December, the sales pace in the second half of the year was lower than the first half as the housing market weaned itself off home buyer tax credits,” said C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young.  “For 2010 as a whole, sales reached 494,900 homes sold, down 9.5 percent from the 546,860 homes sold in 2009.  However, the statewide median price increased 10.2 percent to reach $302,900 for the year, up from the $275,000 recorded in 2009,” she said.

Here are other highlights of C.A.R.’s resale housing report for December 2010:

• A greater than usual drop in listings combined with the sales increase caused C.A.R.’s Unsold Inventory Index to decline more than one month.  The Unsold Inventory Index for existing, single-family detached homes was 5.0 months in December, down from 6.2 months in November.  The index was 3.8 months in December 2009.  The index indicates the number of months needed to deplete the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate. 
• Thirty-year fixed-mortgage interest rates averaged 4.71 percent during December 2010, compared with 4.93 percent in December 2009, according to Freddie Mac. Adjustable-mortgage interest rates averaged 3.31 percent in December 2010, compared with 4.31 percent in December 2009.
• The median number of days it took to sell a single-family home was 57.5 days in December 2010, compared with 35.1 days for the same period a year ago.
Regional MLS sales and price information are contained in the tables that accompany this press release. Regional sales data are not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence home sales.  The MLS median price and sales data for detached homes are generated from a survey of more than 90 associations of REALTORS® throughout the state. MLS median price and sales data for condominiums are based on a survey of more than 60 associations. The median price for both detached homes and condominiums represents closed escrow sales.

In a separate report covering more localized statistics generated by C.A.R. and DataQuick Information Systems, 97 of the 329 cities and communities reporting showed an increase in their respective median home prices from a year ago.  DataQuick statistics are based on county records data rather than MLS information.  DataQuick Information Systems is a subsidiary of Vancouver-based MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates.  (The lists are generated for incorporated cities with a minimum of 30 recorded sales in the month.)

Note: Large changes in local median home prices typically indicate both local home price appreciation, and often, large shifts in the composition of housing market activity.  Some of the variations in median home prices for November may be exaggerated due to compositional changes in housing demand.  The DataQuick tables listing median home prices in California cities and counties are accessible through C.A.R. online at
http://www.car.org/marketdata/historicalprices/2010medianprices/dec2010/.>

• Statewide, the 10 cities with the highest median home prices in California during December 2010 were:  Beverly Hills, $2,180,000; Los Altos, $1,300,000; Calabasas, $1,175,000; Laguna Beach, $1,105,000; Manhattan Beach, $1,085,500; Newport Beach, $1,000,000; Santa Monica, $921,000; Cupertino, $904,500; Rancho Palos Verdes, $849,000; Los Gatos, $840,000.

• Statewide, the cities with the greatest median home price increases in December 2010 compared with the same period a year ago were:  Beverly Hills, 54.3 percent; Calabasas, 39.1 percent; Poway, 25.5 percent; Ridgecrest, 23.3 percent; San Juan Capistrano, 19.2 percent; Compton, 17.5 percent; Laguna Hills, 15.7 percent; Santa Cruz, 14.1 percent; Gilroy, 14.1 percent; La Habra, 13.2 percent.

(Editors’ note:  C.A.R. will no longer publish localized Dataquick numbers beginning with the January 2011 home sales news release to be issued next month.  Also, C.A.R. will begin issuing a Pending Sales Index news release beginning in late February.)

Multimedia:

• Visit http://videos.car.org/mediavault.html?menuID=1&flvID=14 to view a video of C.A.R. Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young discussing highlights of the December sales and price report.

• Visit http://car.org/media/ppt/Dec_UII.ppt to view Unsold Inventory by price point.

• Visit http://car.org/media/ppt/Dec_pk_trough.ppt to view a data table comparing current prices with trough prices in areas throughout the state.

Leading the way...® in California real estate for more than 100 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States, with more than 160,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.

December 2010 Regional Sales and Price Activity*
Regional and Condo Sales Data Not Seasonally Adjusted

 

Median Price

Percent Change in Price from Prior Month

Percent Change in Price from Prior Year

Percent Change in Sales from Prior Month

Percent Change in Sales from Prior Year

 

Dec. 10

Nov. 10

 

Dec. 09

 

Nov. 10

Dec. 09

Statewide

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calif. (sf)

$301,850

1.7%

 

-1.6%

 

5.9%

-6.8%

Calif. (condo)

$246,540

0.0%

 

-8.8%

 

19.3%

-9.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High Desert

$125,480

0.7%

 

3.7%

 

13.2%

-19.6%

Los Angeles

$340,200

-0.4%

 

-3.8%

 

21.9%

-8.6%

Monterey Region

$319,490

0.0%

 

3.5%

 

13.7%

-17.3%

  Monterey County

$244,900

0.0%

 

-2.0%

 

17.7%

-19.1%

  Santa Cruz County

$503,250

-7.1%

 

-8.5%

 

5.8%

-12.9%

Northern California

$235,340

-2.5%

 

-4.5%

 

15.1%

6.0%

Northern Wine Country

$335,890

1.8%

 

-9.6%

 

10.9%

-0.6%

Orange County

$458,700

-8.7%

 

-7.5%

 

15.1%

-5.6%

Palm Springs/Lower Desert

$177,540

8.7%

 

3.0%

 

26.5%

1.3%

Riverside/San Bernardino

$183,540

-1.1%

 

1.3%

 

20.8%

-11.5%

Sacramento

$179,040

3.0%

 

-5.3%

 

6.3%

-8.5%

San Diego

$375,790

-2.5%

 

-1.7%

 

25.5%

-9.5%

San Francisco Bay

$537,520

-2.9%

 

0.3%

 

14.5%

-2.8%

San Luis Obispo

$355,950

1.7%

 

-6.8%

 

5.2%

-7.9%

Santa Barbara County

$420,000

10.9%

 

-5.6%

 

9.9%

-14.0%

     Santa BarbaraSouth Coast

$778,500

-10.0%

 

-7.9%

 

27.5%

-8.3%

     NorthSanta Barbara County

$247,920

0.0%

 

-3.5%

 

-6.3%

-18.9%

Santa Clara

$560,000

-5.1%

 

0.0%

 

11.2%

-5.3%

Ventura

$441,570

-2.7%

 

3.2%

 

2.9%

-6.6%

 

 

* Based on closed escrow sales of single‑family, detached homes only (no condos).  Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as measuring changes in the cost of a standard home.  Prices are influenced by changes in cost and changes in the characteristics and size of homes actually sold.

 sf = single‑family, detached home

Source:  CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® 

Median Price by Region

 

 

Dec. 10

Nov. 10

 

Dec. 09

 

Statewide

 

 

 

 

 

Calif. (sf)

$301,850

$296,690

r

$306,860

r

Calif. (condo)

$246,540

$246,630

 

$270,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High Desert

$125,480

$124,580

 

$121,010

 

Los Angeles

$340,200

$341,650

 

$353,560

 

Monterey Region

$319,490

$319,510

 

$308,570

 

  Monterey County

$244,900

$245,000

 

$250,000

 

  Santa Cruz County

$503,250

$542,000

 

$550,000

 

Northern California

$235,340

$241,340

r

$246,450

 

Northern Wine Country

$335,890

$330,100

 

$371,430

 

Orange County

$458,700

$502,170

 

$496,070

 

Palm Springs/Lower Desert

$177,540

$163,270

 

$172,320

 

Riverside/San Bernardino

$183,540

$185,650

 

$181,130

 

Sacramento

$179,040

$173,870

 

$189,140

 

San Diego

$375,790

$385,490

 

$382,230

 

San Francisco Bay

$537,520

$553,620

 

$536,070

 

San Luis Obispo

$355,950

$350,000

 

$381,940

 

Santa Barbara County

$420,000

$378,570

 

$445,000

r

     Santa BarbaraSouth Coast

$778,500

$865,000

r

$845,000

 

     NorthSanta Barbara County

$247,920

$248,000

 

$256,940

 

Santa Clara

$560,000

$589,980

 

$560,000

 

Ventura

$441,570

$453,610

 

$427,890

 

 

 

 

 

r = revised

Source:  CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® 

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Friday, January 21, 2011

Phil Missig's Listing in Studio City - Just REDUCED - Open House Sunday 1 to 4 pm

 

Tujunga Village / Studio City - REDUCED $140k
 
4231 Tujunga Ave #D Studio City, 91604
 

Private Garden Oasis

Open House Sunday 1:00-4:00pm

Offered at $689,000
*Reduced to $549,000

3 bed / 3bath
2080 sqft

Escape to your PRIVATE hidden garden nestled in the back yard of this one-of-a-kind Tujunga Village condo! True townhouse living in this 3 story home with your own front door and only one shared wall. Your livable space doubles when you add in the beautiful patio with sunset views off the master bedroom and the quiet secret garden with babbling fountain, relaxing jasmine, and abundant shade provided by a giant sycamore. Truly a unique and special home. Plantation shutters and rich hardwood floors throughout. Steam shower and spa in the master bath, full bathroom on each floor. Two minutes away from Aroma Cafe and Tujunga Village, but a world away from the hustle and heat in this quiet end unit set away from the street with tons of light and private outdoor space!

Featured here:
Prudential California Realty
 
Phil Missig

310-844-6434
Phil@philmissig.com

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Thursday, January 20, 2011

New River Boss

Los Angeles River Revitalization Corporation Names First Executive Director

by Roselle Chen
Published: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:45 PM PST
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES – The Los Angeles River Revitalization Corporation today announced the appointment of the organization’s first executive director to helm its restoration plan for the Los Angeles River.

Omar Brownson, who currently serves as chairman of the Liberty Hill Foundation advisory board, a Santa Monica based charitable organization that gives grants to groups in support of social action and change, started his new job on Jan. 17.

“The L.A. River represents one of the city's greatest opportunities for connecting recreation, urban revitalization, and economic development,” Brownson said in a statement. “I am tremendously excited about building the River Corporation platform and bringing to fruition the vision of the L.A. River Revitalization Master Plan along with our numerous River supporters and friends.”

The RRC began in 2009 as a nonprofit corporation to redevelop the area along the banks of and around the river.

Brownson’s immediate plans for the RRC are to explore fundraising opportunities for the land surrounding the river and manage projects for ongoing real estate developments.

The revitalization plan was approved in 2007 by the Los Angeles City Council to open up the 32 miles of waterfront space by the river for parks, businesses, housing, bike paths and more. The space was previously unavailable to the public due to rail yards and other industrial uses.

Contact Roselle Chen at roselle@downtownnews.com.

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Contemporary Beverly Hills house has Old-World flair

Built for gossip columnist Rona Barrett and later owned by singer Luther Vandross, the Harold Levitt-designed Modernist home reimagines a European villa.

A verdant acre in the residential heart of Beverly Hills is the setting for a contemporary home with Old World flair designed by architect-to-the stars Harold "Hal" Levitt.

Levitt's design combines modern elements such as geometric skylights, generous sheets of glass, touches of concrete and an open floor plan in reimagining a European villa.

Levitt, who died in 2003, designed the Riviera Hotel in Las Vegas and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences building in Los Angeles. He's better known, however, for the striking home plans he created for Lew Wasserman, Steven Spielberg, Quincy Jones and Dean Martin, to name a few of his high-profile clients.

This house was built in 1983 for Hollywood gossip columnist Rona Barrett and was later owned by singer-songwriter Luther Vandross. The current owners have made a number of improvements with an eye toward preserving Levitt's Modernist vision.

Set behind gates, the home is hidden from the street. The entrance is on the second floor, with the lower level built into the sloping hillside. Dense walls of vegetation surround a stone-and-concrete motor court and manicured gardens at the front of the house. Stucco walls draped with ivy give way to a pair of 12-foot-tall doors painted hunter green. Beyond those outer doors is a Levitt trademark: a courtyard entry. The space has a limestone path and a small garden on either side.

A second set of green doors opens to the home's entry hall with a patterned limestone floor. In the center of it is a round opening about 10 feet in diameter with a glass-and-steel railing. A large circular skylight centered above the opening brightens the entry hall as well as a round sitting room directly below on the lower level.

A rectangular great room occupies the center of the upper floor and features inlaid wood floors in a weave pattern and a masonry fireplace with an antique carved stone mantel. One section functions as a sunroom, with a slanted rectangular skylight and windows on three sides with views of the backyard. Double glass doors lead to a broad limestone terrace on two sides of the house. The terrace widens at one point to accommodate an outdoor dining area.

Black granite floors and countertops and maple cabinetry adorn the kitchen, which features two islands. The kitchen has two skylights, one of them above the breakfast area. An office built in recent years off the kitchen is the only part of the structure that is not original.

The master bedroom is also on the upper floor of the house. It has a sitting area, a fireplace with a limestone mantel and a pair of glass doors leading to the terrace. The suite includes an attached library with built-in maple cabinetry, dentil moldings and a mirrored wall. There is also a private patio off the master bedroom that has a stone spa with a waterfall. The remodeled master bathroom has floors, walls and counter tops of blue-veined white marble. The divided space has twin marble tubs, a pair of glass-walled showers and a sauna. A walk-in closet with skylight connects the two sides.

In addition to the sitting room, the home's lower level has four bedroom suites and a large den or media room with a custom wood entertainment cabinet with room for three television sets.

A blue Roman pool is at the center of a backyard, which is a study in shades of green. Mature pines, palms and eucalyptus, flowering shrubs and a towering forest of bamboo create walls of privacy on three sides.

To submit a candidate for Home of the Week, send high-resolution color photos on a CD, caption information, the name of the photographer and a description of the house to Lauren Beale, Business, Los Angeles Times, 202 W. 1st St., Los Angeles, CA 90012. Send questions to homeoftheweek@latimes.com.

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Friday, January 14, 2011

Self Employed - Have some cash but can't refinance due to your tax returns - Read this!

A Little-Known Strategy for Cutting Mortgage Payments

HOMEOWNERS looking to lower their monthly mortgage payments and also save some on interest may be able to do so without all the hefty fees and daunting credit requirements of refinancing.

 

A little-known strategy, called “recasting,” or “re-amortization,” is available through some mortgage lenders and servicers.

It involves paying off a lump sum of the principal amount and asking to have the monthly payments reset according to the original interest rate and loan terms. The lump sum reduces the principal, so your new monthly payments decrease slightly and you save on interest paid over the life of the loan.

Lenders typically charge an administrative fee of $150 or more for this service, though borrowers are not required to pay closing costs or submit to another credit check, because they are not asking for a new loan.

Recasting works well for those unable to qualify for refinancing amid the ever-toughening credit guidelines — perhaps because they are self-employed or have less-than-stellar credit — as well as for those with extra cash, like a year-end bonus.

“People don’t really know about it,” said Alan Rosenbaum, the founder and chief executive of the Guardhill Financial Corporation in New York, “but it’s become more common recently.”

Although the term “recasting” is often used by the mortgage industry to refer to interest-rate resets on adjustable-rate mortgages, here the interest rate and loan term stay the same.

Here’s how it might work. Let’s say that as of late December, you had just over $230,449 of principal left on a 30-year fixed-rate loan for $300,000 taken out at 7.93 percent in 1995. You have been paying just under $2,187 a month in principal and interest. But if you put in $20,000 toward that remaining principal and asked your lender to reamortize your payments over the remaining 15 years on the loan, your monthly payment would drop by $184, to around $2,002. Putting in $100,000 would save $945 a month and bring payments to $1,241.

Making extra payments toward the principal while not asking the bank to recast a loan keeps monthly payments the same and merely shortens the time it takes to pay off the loan.

There are a few caveats to recasting, however. The first is that you may need to have a large sum on hand. JPMorgan Chase, for example, charges a $150 fee and requires a minimum $5,000 payment toward the principal.

Another issue is having a lender, or loan servicer, that offers the service. And even those that do may impose restrictions. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America exclude loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs, and loans that were sold off and securitized may also need investor approval.

While few if any lenders advertise recasting, “they are trying to become more customer-service-oriented, and they will do it on a case-by-case basis,” Mr. Rosenbaum said. Homeowners should contact their lender’s customer service department.

Lenders, which would probably rather earn thousands of dollars in closing fees from refinancing your loan, are not obliged to recast mortgages. And certain types of mortgages, for example interest-only and adjustable-rate loans, usually aren’t eligible. The borrower will also need to have been current with all mortgage payments to qualify.

Edward Ades, the owner of Universal Mortgage in Brooklyn, says recasting can be especially useful to recent buyers, for whom it makes little financial sense to refinance but who expect to receive a tax refund or other substantial money after closing on their property, like proceeds from a relative’s sale of property, stocks or other assets.

If your interest rate is 5 percent or lower, Mr. Ades added, it may not make sense to recast a loan, because the extra cash could be put into an investment with a higher return. “At the end of the day,” he said, “I always tell people they have to do whatever makes them sleep better.”

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: January 7, 2011

An earlier version of this article included an incorrect calculus of the monthly savings of re-amortizing a loan.

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Thursday, January 13, 2011

4 Tricks and Traps Foreclosure Buyers Need to Know

By Tara-Nicholle Nelson | Broker in San Francisco, CA
Interest in buying a foreclosed home is on the rise, but so are concerns about the risk involved in the process. In a December survey, Trulia found that 49 percent of Americans were at least somewhat likely to consider buying a foreclosure, up from 45 percent in May 2010.  But the number of US adults who believed there are disadvantages to buying foreclosures had also increased, from 78 percent to 81 percent over the same time frame.  Among those folks who had qualms about purchasing a foreclosure, the top concerns were:

  • that buying a foreclosure might involve hidden costs,
  • that the buying process itself is risky, and
  • that the home might continue to lose value, after escrow closes.
While there certainly are risks that run with buying a foreclosed home, the most risky way to do it is also the least common method: at the foreclosure auction itself. Auction buyers often don't have the opportunity to fully vet the foreclosure to ensure that they are receiving clear title and/or to make sure they're not getting a lemon. With that said, most foreclosures are resold not at the foreclosure auction, but as an REO (short for Real Estate Owned - by the bank), listed by a real estate broker on the Multiple Listing Service and on Trulia! When you buy an REO in this way, you have lots of opportunities to use some tricks of the trade, so to speak, to avoid some of the traps you may fear. Here are my Top 4 Tricks and Traps for Foreclosure Buyers:
1.  As-is means as-is, period.  (Most of the time.) Banks have very little interest, inclination or even the logistically necessary resources to execute repairs on your home. Many of these homes are managed by an asset management company in another state, and may not even have a local person besides the agent who can handle large repairs. Generally speaking, bank-owned homes are sold on a very strict "as-is, where-is" basis, which just means that you should expect to take possession of it, if you buy it, in exactly the position and location it is, no matter how defective.  Do not walk into a viewing of a foreclosed home, notice how the plumbing is all ripped out of the wall, and make an offer for it, assuming you'll be able to get the bank to "fix" the issue later.  Usually, if the bank is willing to do any repairs to a foreclosed home, they do so, on the advice of the listing agent, prior to the home being listed.
Out of hundreds of foreclosure transactions I have personally been involved in, I have seen exactly four where the bank did agree to do some level of repairs at a buyer's request.  Every one of those times, the repair was to fix a health-and-safety endangering property defect, like a gas-leak or an electrical fritz. And every one of those times, the property defect was highly non-obvious - not something even a diligent buyer could have detected visually prior to making an offer.  Maybe another few times I've seen a bank agree to a small price reduction due to surprising condition problems.  And dozens of times, I've seen transactions fall apart or buyers take on the property’s repair costs, when they request repair credits, price reductions or actual repairs from the ban seller.
If a foreclosure you're considering has obvious property damage, have your contractor stop by with you or gather whatever information you need to get as comfortable as possible with your offer price, assuming that the bank will not be chipping anything in for repairs, before you make the offer.

2.  The bank speaks no evil.  
When it comes to real estate disclosures, the fact is, the bank speaks not much of anything!  Many states exempt banks and other types of corporate homeowners from making substantive disclosures about the condition of the property.  Even in jurisdictions where the bank is not legally exempt, most banks will simply write across the required disclosures something to the effect that the bank has no knowledge of the property's condition.  (Before you protest with a "that's not fair!!" keep in mind that the bank never lived in the property, so most often truly does have no idea of any important facts or details about its condition or location, the things an average home seller would be required to disclose.)

Even in a normal transaction, it behooves a buyer to be thorough in having the property inspected and meticulous about reviewing the resulting inspection reports.  But buying a foreclosure ups even that ante, as you have no seller disclosures to highlight particular problems you should have looked at, and none of the usual legal recourse you would have if a “regular” seller made incomplete disclosures.  Get a property inspection.  A pest inspection.  A roof inspection.  A sewer line inspection. A pool inspection, if you have a pool and care about its condition. Yes - all these inspections cost money, but the drama and thousands each of them can save you is well worth it. And read your state’s buyer inspection advisory or similar document (ask your agent), just to make sure you’re aware of all the inspections that are available to you, and work with your agent to determine which ones make sense, and which are not appropriate.
Some insider tips:

  • Vacant foreclosures often have their utilities disconnected.  Work with your agent to make sure the utilities get turned on - even for a single day - so that your property inspector can run the water taps, test the stove and dishwasher, see if the water heater and electrical outlets work, and so forth.
  • If appliances are there, the bank will probably leave them there, even though they may not have technical “legal” ownership of them, so they may not be included in the contract, like in a "normal" home sale.
  • However, the bank will not give you any sort of warranty on appliances, so try to obtain any warranty coverage you want or need elsewhere - from a home warranty company or, potentially, the original manufacturer/retailer.

3.  The contract terms, they are a changin'.
One thing squarely in the wheelhouses of local real estate pros are local market standard practices.  From negotiating practices to which party pays which closing costs, every market is different, and experienced local agents are experts on this information.  If you’re buying a foreclosure, though, the bank will often require you to use it’s own purchase contract, rather than the more commonly used state forms.  Many times, this is done to advise the buyer of the bank’s refusal to make substantive disclosures (see above) and to change some of the normal practices for your area to the bank’s standard practices.  For instance, if you are buying a home in a contingency state, where you would usually have to sign a document proactively releasing contingencies, the bank’s contract will probably change that, so that your transaction operates on an objection period. In "objection" based transactions, you  have a certain period of time in which you must either speak up about your concerns with the property and/or cancel the deal, or you will automatically be presumed to be moving forward with the deal and your deposit money will be forfeited if you change your mind after that date. 
If you’ve been making offers on non-foreclosures on the standard contract form, or you’ve bought homes before and think you know the drill, please - I implore you - READ every word of the contract you sign when you buy a home from the bank, and ask your broker, agent or attorney to explain anything that doesn’t make sense.
4.  Expect the unexpected.  When you buy a foreclosure, you might end up working with the bank’s escrow company, instead of a company you or your agent selects.  And the bank's escrow provider might be slow or disorganized.  C’est la vie. The bank might rush you for your deposit money, but take their own sweet time coming up with the necessary signatures on their end to close the deal.  Par for the course.  You might expect that the bank would be desperate for buyers, and instead find out that there are 20 offers on the same REO.  Or, you might be the only offer and still get your aggressively low (but still reasonable) offer rejected, only to have the bank reduce the list price of the home to the same price of your offer!  (They often want to see if exposing it to other buyers at the new, lower list price might generate more interest and higher offers.)  

When you’re buying a foreclosure, expect glitches, expect your calendar to be derailed, expect the bank to be inflexible and possibly even unreasonable.  It’s not overkill to ask your broker or agent to brief you on the common complications they see in REO transactions.  Having realistic expectations may keep you from pulling your hair out.  And if the transaction turns out to run smooth as silk?  You’ll be pleasantly surprised.

Pin It

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Now is the time to sell, real estate consultant says

People who have been delaying putting their homes on the market should do it soon because prices may go down 5% to 8% as banks unload a glut of repossessed properties, Steve Harney tells agents.

Sell now, avoid (some) regret later.

That was Steve Harney's advice recently to a roomful of real estate agents. Harney is a housing industry consultant who told the assembled agents of John Greene Realtor in Naperville, Ill., that they should tell clients who have been sitting on the fence about selling that the time is now — if they want to sidestep more marketplace competition in a few months.

Or, as he put it, the cork in the dam is about to pop.

That "cork" is banks' indecisiveness. The "water" behind the dam is their stockpile of foreclosed homes, which has been growing with a vengeance for a couple of reasons, Harney said.

Banks have been in a state of limbo this year about what to do with repossessed houses, and so they have mostly held on to them in order not to add to the nation's oversupply of homes for sale, Harney told the agents.

"The banks have been saying, 'There has to be a number [the market] can hit where we can keep the river going without flooding the valley,'" he said.

Apparently, he said, the nation hit that number recently, as prices reached a relative level of stabilization. A Dec. 17 report from Re/Max, for example, said sale prices dropped "only" 1.7% from last year in its 54-city survey, which would indicate general price equilibrium.

But before you break into applause, consider that while the banks were waiting for that sign of stability to decide when to put their holdings on the market, they also were foreclosing at a rapid pace.

"In August, the number of houses banks took back was up 49% over the year before, and September was the greatest month in history for repossessions," Harney said.

That's bad for individuals, of course, but necessary, in Harney's view, for the housing market to heal itself.

Then, the robo-signing mortgage-document fiasco unfolded, causing major lenders to put new foreclosures on hold for a while. But as that situation begins to inch toward resolution, banks are resuming foreclosures, which is only putting more pressure on the dam, Harney said.

With the general agreement that the market has hit some long-awaited neutral spot, the banks have their hand on the cork, Harney said. He, among others, expects that cork to come out by the second quarter, as lenders push 3 million or 4 million (as seen by foreclosure-data firm RealtyTrac) to 8 million (as forecast by Morgan Stanley) foreclosed houses onto the market.

As a result, the burgeoning inventory should push prices down 5% to 8%, Harney said, although gloomier views foresee a 20% drop.

Harney is among those who believe that the worst is generally over for the market, and that the inventory mess and lending issues will work themselves out in 18 months or so as pent-up buyer demand begins to reassert itself.

Meanwhile, he said, selling earlier this year will probably net a better return than late.

"If you have a $500,000 house in Chicago, and the price drops 5%, you've just lost $25,000," he said. "That's why I'm telling agents, 'Don't let sellers wait till spring; they're going to lose money.' "

But what does that mean for buyers this year? Why should they buy from those early-year sellers if the prices are going to drop further?

Harney good-naturedly espouses a kind of logic that seems endemic to the real estate industry (and drives some economists crazy): That it's always a good time to buy — and to sell.

"There's no good news or bad news, just news," Harney said. "Every time a house rises in value, there's a person who makes money and a person who says, 'Darn!'

"And every time a house loses value, there's a person who says, 'Darn!' and a person who says, 'I got a steal!' "

Buyers, he said, should take a look at those recent charts that show mortgage interest rates creeping up and consider how much it might cost them to wait.

"That cost is going to go up, even as prices go down," said the former owner of a New York real estate brokerage. "Now is the time to buy."

Umberger writes for the Chicago Tribune.

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Monday, January 10, 2011

Shenzhen New World Group Purchased Marriott Hotel in L.A.

World Trade Centre Association in Los Angeles, California declared that Shenzhen New World Group has purchased Marriott Hotel with 60 million dollars, and was to invest more 1.3 million dollars to perfect the hotel.

Though neither of Shenzhen New World Group and Marriott Hotel has formally announced the price, Alan Lay, the consultant of Atlas Hotel Group, indicated that Shenzhen New World Group had paid 60 million dollars for the hotel which includes 469 rooms. When Marriott Hotel’s business was moving well in 2007, Namtso capital group, who is interested in purchasing, had quoted a high price of 11.5 million dollars.

Since Oct.2008, as deterioration of the economic condition, American Hospitality’s revenues began to decline linearly. Last summer, the GM capital lender confiscated Marriott Hotel at the downtown of Los Angeles.

Built in 1983, the hotel with 14 stories had luxury like Sheraton, but it was lack of necessary maintenance due to insufficiency of funds in recent years. Lay said, actually it was agreeable with current trends in Hospitality for Shenzhen New World Group acquiring the hotel at the half price in 2007, since the price of the hotel has also gone down 50%.

Shenzhen New World Group Purchased Marriott Hotel in L.A.

Shenzhen New World Group Purchased Marriott Hotel in L.A.

Rey said, “In the long term, it’s a good bargain to purchase Marriott Hotel at this price. However, the Shenzhen New World will also have to invest greatly in the refurbishment of hotel to make it in line with existing standards.” Shenzhen New World Group plans to invest 13 million U.S. dollars in repair cost, which includes updating its electricity and water supply systems to meet the benchmarks of modern energy efficiency.

This is the first acquisition of the California assets by China’s Shenzhen. The New World Group, based in Shenzhen, is continuing to seek other acquisition opportunities in the United States.

“We do witness more and more Asian investors to be interested in the investment in the West Coast’s gateway cities in U.S.,” Rey said, Asian investors recently purchased the W Hotel in San Francisco and L’Oreal Vettel Beverly Villa Hotel.

Shenzhen Post Rebecca Contributes to the Story.

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Friday, January 7, 2011

Pacific Park on Santa Monica Pier is sold

CNL Lifestyle Properties, a Florida real estate trust, buys the amusement area for $34 million.

Posted via email from HaveYouSeenMyHouse -posterous

Pin It

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Phil Missig was the listing agent on this Los Feliz hills home when Alix bought it, she has done an amazing job!



Pin It